After two consecutive years of trying to enter one of my athletes who has proven to be one of the top youth scullers in the country into Head of the Charles, only to have her waitlisted both times, it dawned on me: Why can’t HOCR use a merit-based system for youth single events? It’s the only event in rowing where the rower represents the entry 100 percent.

In addition to “10 Ways to Save Rowing” (June issue), I suggest adding an 11th: Make singles entries based on merit. Though I’m referring specifically to Head of the Charles, this could be applied to other races where entries are at a premium, and it may make some regattas more attractive to faster single scullers.

Head of the Charles boasts of being the most prestigious regatta in the country and hosts athletes and teams from across the nation and around the world. Why wouldn’t the regatta committee want the most diverse group of fast athletes racing for medals in this event? As it stands, there are typically about 45 spots available for women’s and 50 spots for men’s youth single entries at the Charles.

The athlete at my club rows on a very small team in a part of the country where rowing isn’t well known, and she has dedicated a lot of extra effort because of her love of the sport. She has put in countless hours with the team and on her own to become the best athlete she can be. Unlike the Charles River, there are no rival boathouses on our body of water, no early-morning rows alongside other strong competitors to inspire our athletes to get faster every day. I would argue that it’s more difficult to train without a large team pushing you on.

At HOCR, there are five more entries available in the boys’ singles event than in the girls’, which are allocated specifically for local clubs along the Charles River. These club members have the opportunity to row this iconic river every day. Why not reward a well-deserving female athlete who has overcome the disadvantage of her geographic location and who may never have another chance to race in such a legendary event?

To make this a merit-based system, there’s a simple solution. The committee would gather the names of the athletes who made the grand finals at USRowing Youth Nationals in the youth and U17 singles, and the grand final from Scholastic Rowing Association of America nationals in the senior single. HOCR organizers would extend invitations to those athletes directly or wait to see who registers and make sure they are priority entries. That would mean monitoring 18 to 22 athletes of each gender.

I imagine there would be some overlap with guaranteed entries, and several athletes would have graduated to college programs or wouldn’t be interested in racing. With 10 to 15 merit-based entries for each gender, there still would be plenty of entries available for the regatta’s traditional lottery system.

HOCR invitations would be an honor to receive and a goal for which rowers could strive. The impact of such an opportunity for small-club rowers would be far-reaching. Beyond the incredible rowing experience for the athlete, it would bring attention to the rowing club, thereby motivating other young rowers to strive for such success, inspiring others to try the sport, and stirring regional interest in the sport through media coverage.

Imagine what a handful of these fast rowers from all corners of the country could do to promote this niche sport, increase participation, and help strengthen USA sculling as a whole on the national stage.

Ted Riedeburg
Director, Head Coach
Rock City Rowing and
Episcopal Collegiate School
Little Rock, Ark.

In his column for the October edition of the print magazine, Doctor Rowing writes, “Scratch any rower and he’ll tell you who helped him rise.”

That’s certainly the case with Olympic champion Pete Cipollone, winner of eight Olympic and worlds medals (five of them gold) back in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the U.S. National Team ruled the world in eights.

Cipollone credits coach Mike Teti with “one of the most important pieces of coaching I ever got,” which you can read in October’s Coxing column by George Kirschbaum.

Teti continues to foster U.S. Olympic success, coaching at California Rowing Club, where most of the U.S. National Team men’s four and eight that won Olympic gold and bronze in Paris trained when they weren’t in USRowing selection camps or on training and racing trips.

Clubs provide essential opportunities and support for athletes outside of the schools and universities that expose most rowers to the sport for the first time. The head coaches (if not the assistants) of the top collegiate programs benefit from better pay owing in part to the salary surveys of their coaching associations, the Collegiate Rowing Coaches Association (for women’s programs) and the Intercollegiate Rowing Coaches Association (for men’s). Read more about it in the October issue of Rowing News.

As opportunities to walk on to a college varsity program as a novice disappear, clubs become an even more important part of our sport. Also in the October issue of Rowing News, Amy Wilton tells the instructive stories of the advent of several clubs founded through the passion of rowers bent on sharing the transformative power of our great sport with others.

May it inspire you to do the same.