Home Blog Page 16

Three-time Olympian Michiel Bartman Will Head St. Joe’s Men’s Rowing

Michiel Bartman has been named Saint Joseph’s Director of Rowing and Men’s Rowing Head Coach. PHOTO: Courtesy Saint Joseph's Athletics.

 

By Katie Lane

After spending three years as the head coach of Jefferson University women’s rowing, Michiel Bartman—recently named  coach of the year in the East Region by the Collegiate Rowing Coaches Association—will remain in Philadelphia, moving upstream to Saint Joseph’s University to become director of rowing and head coach of men’s rowing.

“I’m excited to start a new chapter at SJU,” Bartman said. “Mike Irwin did a fantastic job with the team, culminating with a seventh-place finish in the men’s varsity four at the IRAs earlier this year.”

Bartman replaces former head coach Mike Irwin, who was hired as an assistant coach of the heavyweight men’s team at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis.

Bartman aims to further the success of the program, he said, by qualifying more of the team for IRAs and taking advantage of the newly allotted qualifying spots at the Dad Vail Regatta.

“SJU’s boathouse and campus facilities are top-notch,” he said, “and the Schuylkill River remains one of the best spots to row and coach in the U.S.”

As an athlete, Bartman represented The Netherlands in three Olympic Games, winning gold in the men’s eight in 1996 (Atlanta), silver in the men’s quadruple sculls in 2000 (Sydney), and silver in the men’s eight in 2004 (Athens). He also captured medals at three separate world championships and from 2002 to 2004 served as chairman of the Dutch National Olympic Athletes Committee.

The Netherlands Tops Medals Table at 2025 World Rowing Championships

The Netherlands won both the men's and women's eights at the 2025 World Rowing Championships. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

The 2025 World Rowing Championships concluded in Shanghai, China, with The Netherlands coming out on top of the medals with four gold medals, one silver, and one bronze. The Netherlands won both the men’s and women’s eights, a first for the nation of 18 million. Great Britain, with the most medals overall, was second with three golds, four silvers, and a bronze.

The United States tied Ireland in fifth, with each nation winning two gold medals, and four total, each, overall—good for sixth, total. Canada’s best finishes were sixth place in the A final of the women’s quad and first place in three B finals—for seventh place—in the women’s eight, single scull, and lightweight single scull. In all, 25 nations won at least one medal from the 23 events contested.

The 2026 World Rowing Championships will be held August 23-30 on the Bosbaan in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Dartmouth Names New Associate Head Coach of Women’s Rowing

 

Gordon Getsinger is the new associate head coach of women’s rowing at Dartmouth.

Getsinger returns to the Northeast after a successful five-year run as an assistant coach and lead recruiter with the University of Washington Huskies. He coached the second varsity eight to a gold medal at the 2025 Big 10 Conference Championships and a silver medal at the 2025 NCAA National Championships, helping the Huskies finish fourth overall in the nation.

“I’m grateful for my time in Seattle and honored to have worked with head coach Yaz Farooq and the women of Washington,” Getsinger said.

“This move makes a lot of sense to me. I am very excited to join Dartmouth women’s rowing, building on the program’s incredible momentum under head coach John Graves, while reconnecting my family with our Northeast roots.”

Before coming to Washington, Getsinger built Saugatuck Rowing into one of the most successful junior programs in the country, winning five consecutive titles at Head of the Charles and the USRowing Youth National Championships in the women’s eight from 2015 to 2019.

Recruiting: Start Early—and Follow the Rules

Youth quads racing at the American Youth Cup at Nathan Benderson Park in Sarasota, Florida. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

If you’re a high-school rower thinking about competing at the college level, the time to begin preparing is now. Even if you’re only in ninth or 10th grade and not yet allowed to speak directly with college coaches, there’s still a lot you can do to get ready—and a few things about which you need to be careful.

First, make sure you’re on track academically. You’ll need to take the right core courses to be eligible to row at the university level, and that planning should begin early. Your grades, and your SAT or ACT scores, will be major factors in your chances of being admitted to top schools. Coaches look at more than just your rowing ability; they want to know you can succeed in the classroom, too.

Of course, your athletic performance matters. Your erg scores, technique, and results on the water are all key parts of your recruiting profile.

As I work with rowers across the U.S. and around the world, I’ve become aware of a concerning trend: Some 10th graders and their families are being contacted by college coaches before NCAA rules allow. Sometimes coaches will say things like, “This is just between us,” or refer to it as “soft recruiting.” No matter what they call it, it’s not permitted under NCAA rules.

It’s important to remember that recruiting isn’t just about colleges choosing athletes; it’s also about your learning what kind of program and coaching style will be the right fit for you. That means the process should be transparent, respectful, and rule-abiding.

So what should you do if coaches reach out too early? Be polite but clear. Let them know you’re aware of the rules and ask them to wait until the official recruiting window opens. If the contact continues, consider forwarding the message to the head coach. Most coaches will understand and stop right away; some may have thought you were older and made an honest mistake.

By beginning early, staying informed, and sticking to the rules, you’ll be setting yourself up for success—not only as a recruit but also a student-athlete who’s ready to thrive at the next level.

Robbie Tenenbaum coached at the NCAA level for over 30 years and with the U.S. Junior National Team for eight. He now helps rowers and families navigate the university recruiting process.

The Principles of Periodization

The U.S. National Team trains at Nathan Benderson Park in Sarasota, Florida. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

Periodization is a tried-and-true method for organizing training. The first to use the term was Soviet physiologist Leonid Matveyev in 1964. In studying Olympians, he discerned patterns in the training of successful athletes that led him to develop the concept.

In the years since, much research has been done on periodization, but the main principles still apply. Periodization is a system for training in which load and recovery vary based on physiological principles.

Typically, a gradual increase in training volume and intensity is followed by periods of lower training loads. The idea is that progressive increases in training demands should be followed by periods of lower training loads to enable an athlete’s body to adapt and to improve performance.

The goal of training periodization is twofold:

—to maximize fitness and athletic performance while minimizing overtraining and the risk of injury;

—to manipulate training variables so that athletes peak at the desired time.

Athletes need to develop several sport-specific qualities to perform well—strength, endurance, technique, tactical skill, psychological toughness, etc. Since such qualities can’t be acquired simultaneously, certain periods of the training year are reserved for focusing on them sequentially.

Matveyev’s training model consists of three phases: preparation, competition, and transition.

The preparation phase is for building basic athletic skills, such as, in rowing especially, endurance, strength, technique, and the ability to recover from strenuous training.

In the competition phase, athletes increase the intensity of exertion to transform basic skills into racing speed, while learning the rules of competition, improving tactical skills, and building sufficient endurance to withstand the rigors of competition.

The transition period is for healing injuries and recovering from training and racing.

Because most rowers have a spring and autumn season, the sequence of preparation, competition, and transition should be carried out twice a year. Double periodization can be very successful when all phases are planned and timed well, beginning with the climactic regatta and going backward from there.

Usually, coaches are quite capable of executing the preparation and competition periods, but they find it harder to acknowledge the importance of the transition period. Some coaches figure that everyone just needs a break or they fear losing the fitness gained in previous phases.

The transition period is an essential part of Matveyev’s scheme and, when designed correctly, can benefit athletes enormously. It provides a respite from rowing and the stress of competition and an opportunity to recharge by enjoying other sports—swimming, surfing, hiking.

It’s also a time for attending to injuries that may not have healed fully and for improving in such areas as balance, coordination, rhythm, and flexibility.

During this phase, basic fitness can be maintained with an easy run on the beach or a leisurely bike ride in the mountains. Training volume and intensity should yield to fun, refreshment, and rejuvenation.

Volker Nolte, an internationally recognized expert on the biomechanics of rowing, is the author of Rowing Science, Rowing Faster, and Masters Rowing. He’s a retired professor of biomechanics at the University of Western Ontario, where he coached the men’s rowing team to three Canadian national titles.

Gold at Worlds for U.S. Women’s Four

The U.S. four of bow Camille Vandermeer, Azja Czajkowski, Teal Cohen, and stroke Kaitlin Knifton won gold at the 2025 World Rowing Championships. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

The U.S. women’s four of bow Camille Vandermeer, Azja Czajkowski, Teal Cohen, and stroke Kaitlin Knifton hung on to win the 2025 World Rowing Championships, less than a second ahead of Romania in second and New Zealand in third. The Netherlands, Great Britain, and China rounded out the A final.

U.S. Women’s Pair Wins Bronze, Sechser Sets Fastest Semi Time at Worlds

Michelle Sechser posted the fastest semifinal time at the 2025 World Rowing Championships, Shanghai, China, Sept. 21-28. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

The U.S women’s pair of Holly Drapp (Univ. of Washington ’22) and  Jess Thoennes (Univ. of Washington ’18) won the bronze medal on Thursday, day five of the 2025 World Rowing Championships in Shanghai, China. Romania won in 7:08.5, France was second in 7:13.3, and the U.S. pair finished third in 7:13.9

Michelle Sechser set the best time in the semifinals (8:01.2) of the women’s lightweight single, winning hers by open water. Ireland’s Siobhan Mc Crohan won the other semi in 8:06.2, making Sechser the favorite for Saturday’s A final.

Both U.S. eights advanced from their heats to the A finals. Neither Canadian eight finished first or second, nor had the one of the next fastest two times, and will race in the B finals at these worlds, which no longer feature repechage heats.

The U.S. men’s quad finished fourth in the A final, the best finish for the U.S. in the event since 1998. Canada’s women’s quad finished sixth the A final. The U.S. women’s quad finished fourth in the B final, for 10th overall.

Schedule  |  Livestream  |  Results

Salary Surveys Reveal Variation and Discrepancies

Michael Callahan (right), head coach of the two-time defending national champion University of Washington heavyweights, is the top-paid coach in men's rowing. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

The pay of head rowing coaches varies widely—from less than $50,000 to over $300,000–surveys by the sport’s two coaches associations show.

Division I NCAA women’s head coaches make more (median pay: $107,499) than IRA heavyweight men’s head coaches (average $85,000 to $99,000).

Power 4 conference (Big 10, Big 12, ACC, and SEC) women’s head coaches were paid even higher salaries, with median compensation of $137,499. Median pay for NCAA Division II head coaches was $54,999, and higher for NCAA Division III head coaches at $72,499.

“We do these surveys as a service to our members and the sport in general,” said Chris Clark, co-president and co-founder of the Intercollegiate Rowing Coaches Association, for men’s coaches. “Without them, it’s an opaque market—to the disadvantage of the coaches.”

The survey by the Collegiate Rowing Coaches Association, for women’s coaches, received 73 responses, with 62 disclosing salary data. The IRCA survey collected responses from 55 institutions, representing 95 percent of the association’s membership, with 46 completing the full survey. Many coaches’ salaries and contracts are public information, available online and through information requests and reporting services.

“Things being more public is only good, for the coaches,” said Texas head coach and CRCA board member Dave O’Neill, “even if it’s uncomfortable.”

Most of the coaches contacted about the salary surveys were unwilling to comment on the record—a reflection of the sensitive nature of the subject as well as the tendency of rowing coaches to avoid controversy. Many head rowing coaches consider their positions dream jobs unlikely to be improved by change, although many complain about the low wages.

Each survey broke down pay by position—head coach, associate head or first assistant coach, and third assistant—and conference. Benefits like health insurance, retirement plans, and leave were common among all leagues and both surveys. Club memberships and cars were among the benefits listed in coaches’ contracts, as were additional job responsibilities, such as meeting with local businesses and running summer camps.

The CRCA survey did not address funding sources, while the IRCA survey noted a variety of ways coaches get paid, commonly through booster, alumni, and charitable family foundations.

Last year, the eventual national champions lost their regular-season contest against their bitter rivals but won the season finale against another program when the rivals failed to advance to the final. That storyline earned Ohio State’s head football coach, Ryan Day, over $10 million in compensation from his Big 10 school.

The same storyline earned Washington men’s rowing head coach, Michael Callahan, less than three percent of that—about $330,000 total salary, mostly earned through performance bonuses—making him the highest-paid men’s college rowing coach in America.

(Ryan Day’s total makes him only the fifth-highest-paid college football coach. Top of the heap: Georgia’s Kirby Smart, at over $13 million).

At the 2024 Olympic Games, 17 Huskies competed, winning 11 total medals. Callahan coached the U.S. men’s Olympic eight, winners of the bronze medal—with four Huskies on board. As this issue went to press, 22 Huskies headed to Shanghai to compete in the 2025 World Rowing Championships, with the largest number of them there to compete for the United States.

Callahan and Washington’s head women’s coach Yaz Farooq were paid roughly the same amount the year before, according to Washington state data, which likely makes Farooq the top-paid women’s coach.

Private institutions, like NCAA DI team champion Stanford and DI varsity eight winner Yale, do not report salaries and contracts publicly.

The pay disparity gets even worse among assistant coaches. Ohio State’s football staff has seven members making over a million dollars each, and the 11th-highest paid staffer—linebackers coach James Laurinaitis, who took home $350,000—still earns more than the top rowing coaches. The average assistant coach, according to the IRCA salary survey, makes about $50,000.

Comparing rowing to college football, with its billions of dollars in TV revenue, is apples to watermelons at best, of course. Comparing rowing to track & field, with its large rosters of student-athletes racing in an Olympic sport, is more apt.

There again, however, colleges underpay rowing coaches compared to their peers. For example, Ohio State paid women’s rowing head coach Emily Gackowski $160,000 and track & field/cross-country head coach Rosalind Joseph $212,180—over $50,000 more—despite the fact that rowing typically serves a bigger roster.

Rowing, along with every other sport that is not football or basketball, faces an uncertain funding future as the NCAA falls apart in the wake of the Supreme Court’s NCAA antitrust decision and settlement, which allows college athletes to be paid directly, players to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL), and massive increases in TV broadcast payments to football conferences.

Football programs today spend as much as they receive for broadcast rights (and sometimes more), The Atlantic reported recently. Result: The vast increase in revenue has not produced balanced budgets or surpluses to support non-revenue sports.

Among college Olympic sports, a further division between those that charge admission (volleyball, softball) and those that don’t (rowing) has led some universities to set up NIL opportunities for “ticketed” sports and not for others.

Much attention has been paid to the rise of international recruits in both men’s and women’s varsity rowing programs (funded by a school’s athletic department as opposed to club programs, which are funded by student activity fees and dues). A commonly expressed concern has been whether the displacement of domestic athletes by internationals has hurt the development of U.S. Olympic rowers. The salary surveys, however, finger a more likely culprit: the demise of novice and freshman programs and their coaching positions.

The top assistant rowing coach used to be the freshman or novice caoch. Not so anymore. Instead, those positions have been replaced almost totally by recruiting coordinators.

Practically no walk-on opportunities exist in the top IRA and NCAA Division I programs—sources of the entire 2024 U.S. Olympic squad (with the exception of three-time Olympian Meghan Musnicki, who began rowing at Division III St. Lawrence University).

Some of the most successful U.S. Olympic rowers ever, such as Susan Francia, who, like Musnicki, is a two-time Olympic rowing gold medalist, learned to row in college. Today, that opportunity barely exists in Division I rowing, the surveys show. One coach said he would be laughed out of his athletic administration offices for even suggesting the reinstatement of a novice coaching position. There is no real pathway to the Olympics in U.S. rowing besides Division I varsity programs, currently.

Following the money is a good way to understand how a situation came to be. The CRCA and IRCA surveys help head coaches receive better pay for the valuable work they do, but more TV money hasn’t led to more opportunities for student-athletes—the ostensible purpose of college sports.