HomeNewsSugar Substitutes: Good, Bad, Ugly?

    Sugar Substitutes: Good, Bad, Ugly?

    Published on


    To continue reading…

    Register for free to get limited access to the best reporting available.
    Free accounts can read one story a month without paying. Register for free

    Or subscribe to get unlimited access to the best reporting available. Subscribe

    To learn about group subscriptions, click here.

    Today’s rowers are confronted with a plethora of foods and beverages containing low or no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS): Diet Pepsi, Halo-Top ice cream, Gatorade Zero, Nuun. Questions arise: Are these products a better option than their sugar-containing versions? Will they help you lose weight? Are they safe? Should athletes eat them or avoid them?

    The goal of this article is not to advocate for or against LNCS sweeteners, such as Equal (aspartame), Sweet ’N Low (saccharine), and Truvia (stevia) but rather to offer science-based information to help you decide whether or not they are safe to include in your sports diet.

    Background info    

    The 2020-25 U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans state that we should limit added sugars to less than 10 percent of our daily calories. The average (i.e., unfit, fat) American consumes about 270 calories (17 teaspoons, 13 percent of total calories) of added sugars a day. Soft drinks, other sweetened beverages, cookies, candy, and desserts are common culprits. For a sedentary person who may require 1,800 calories a day, 10 percent of calories equates to 180 calories (45 grams) of added sugars a day that displaces wholesome foods. Given that exercise enhances our ability to metabolize sugar, rowers and other active people are less likely to end up with health issues (pre-diabetes, Type 2 diabetes) related to sugar consumption. For them, added sugars can be a useful source of muscle fuel. Ideally, the sugar comes surrounded by nutrients, such as a post-exercise recovery chug of chocolate milk or flavored Greek yogurt.

    Today’s serious rowers often select their foods more wisely than the average American. Their hope is not only to enhance performance but also to reduce their risk of injury and invest in their longevity. For a rower eating more than 3,000 calories a day, the guideline of less than 10 percent of total calories from added sugars equates to 300 calories (75 grams) of added sugars a day. That leaves plenty of space for some sugary sports foods and treats, if desired. 

    Rowers’ bodies tend to use sugars readily (they appear in the blood as glucose) to replenish depleted muscle glycogen stores. During long hard workouts, sugar-filled gels and sports drinks can enhance performance. So why would a rower want to choose a Gatorade Zero, Nuun, or Propel with LNCS? 

    Well, if rowers are weight-conscious, LNCS can help them save a few calories (though doing so while exercising can hurt performance). With meals and snacks, swapping a can of sugar-sweetened soda for a diet soda allows the rower to enjoy 150 more calories of nutrient-dense foods, such as fruits or veggies. (We know what often happens, however. The saved calories go towards cookies. Ha!)

    Are foods sweetened with LNCS a way for rowers to have their cake and eat it, too? The media have certainly stigmatized LNCS, leading many to believe they are mysterious chemicals, contribute to obesity, and bolster one’s sweet tooth. Are they really bad for you? Let’s take a look at what science says. 

    Aren’t they nothing but (scary) chemicals?
    All foods are made of chemicals: carbon, oxygen, nitrogen. Aspartame (brand names are NutraSweet and Equal) is made of two amino acids that taste 200 times sweeter than table sugar. You need very little of it. The powder in the blue packet is mostly a harmless filler that keeps the few molecules of sweetener from getting lost in the packaging.

    Are they safe to consume?

    Sugar substitutes are among the most highly studied ingredients out there. The FDA, WHO, and other global health organizations have confirmed the safety of these products in doses well above the amounts commonly consumed by humans. Studies that reported a link to cancer were done with animals given absurd amounts of no- or low-cal sweeteners and are not relevant to humans in real life.

    That said, the FDA has established Acceptable Daily Intakes (ADI) for these sweeteners. ADI is the amount of a LNCS humans can consume every day during their lives—with a built-in 100-fold safety factor below which no adverse effects have been seen. For aspartame, the ADI equates to 107 of those little blue packets a day (19 cans of diet soda every day of your life). So yes, some rowers could overshoot the ADI—but it’s highly unlikely! 

    Do low- and no-calorie sweeteners lead to weight loss?

    LNCS is one tool in a dieter’s toolbox. They can help dieting rowers lose weight if they displace calories the dieter does not replace. For example, one athlete told me he lost 30 pounds in a year just by trading in his lunch and dinner-time can of Pepsi for Diet Pepsi. That one simple change shaved off 300 calories a day that he did not replace. That said, research indicates people can easily compensate for the calories by eating more or other foods.

    Do low- and no-calorie sweeteners lead to weight gain? 

    No. People who drink diet soda are more likely to be overweight, but diet soda did not cause weight gain. Rather, people who live in large bodies are more likely to use LNCS to save some calories.

    Don’t these sweeteners trick the body into thinking it’s getting sugar—and trigger a spike in blood glucose, followed by a crash and hunger?

    Well-controlled, randomized studies indicate the answer is no. Nor do LNCS make people feel hungrier. Some animal studies have shown that LNCS might increase appetite, but those studies were conducted with large amounts of LNCS that we would never consume. This has not been replicated in humans.

    Do no- or low-cal sweeteners have a negative impact on the microbiome? 

    Questionable research with mice who consumed very large amounts of saccharin suggests it might impact the microbiome of rodents. But no conclusive evidence to date indicates LNCS negatively impacts the human gut microbiome. Stay tuned.

    The bottom line

    We are all born with an innate desire for sweet tastes, starting with breast milk. We have many options for satisfying that sweet tooth in good health. Take your choice!

    Sports Nutritionist Nancy Clark, M.S., R.D., counsels both casual and competitive athletes in the Boston area (Newton, 617-795-1875). Her Sports Nutrition Guidebook can help you figure out how to eat to perform well and stay healthy. Visit 

    More like this