Home Blog Page 5

Temple Rowing: From the Schuylkill to the Thames

Photo: Temple Athletics.

 

By Mike Jensen

A million meters on the erg?

In one summer?

That sounds like a goal too far, a torture too cruel. Just break it down, though. And add an incentive. Take that ergometer for a 10,000-meter ride every day, for 100 days, don’t miss a day, and you’ll get your million.

That’s what Temple men’s rowing coach Brendan Cunningham did the summer before his junior year at the school where he now coaches. The challenge was presented to him by an older brother who had preceded him in the sport.

Brendan’s father had just died that spring. Brendan was drifting a bit. Gavin White, Temple’s legendary coach, saw that, and also saw potential. He was thinking about giving Cunningham some scholarship money. Brendan’s brother Luke presented Brendan the challenge: Go a million meters on the rowing machine that summer, and Luke would get him a PlayStation.

“When he came back to school, his roommates had a PlayStation,” Luke said.

“It was a great deal for my roommates,” Brendan said.

Better yet, Brendan had a spot in Temple’s first varsity eight, plus some scholarship money.

He hadn’t been averse to the work required by the sport. His high-school coach, Dave Krmpotich, had won a silver medal at the 1988 Olympics and would bring his own pre-Olympic workouts to the boys for their winter workouts. If that seemed insane to them, they took pride in the insanity.

So Cunningham, entering his second season as Temple’s coach last fall, knew the value of setting distant goals. In 2024, one of his rowers, Ryan Yates, had texted Cunningham and asked him what it would take for them to go to Henley the next year, to row in the Henley Royal Regatta.

The coach texted back, “Win Dad Vails.”

Photo: Tim McCall / Temple Athletics.

That used to be a regular thing—Temple’s men dominating the varsity eight in the big local race of the year. Walk in what they call the Great Room, the lobby of the East Park Canoe House, just below the Strawberry Mansion Bridge along the east bank of the Schuylkill River, there’s a banner noting Temple’s Dad Vail Varsity Eight Championships. Every year from 1983 to ’87, missing in ’88, then every year from 1989 to 2001. Another miss in 2002, then titles in 2003 and ’04.

Then there was a drought.

Brendan was there early in the drought, and experienced the reason for it.

“We were in the boathouse for the first fall. Then that winter, Gavin was like, ‘We’ve been evicted,’”Cunningham said.

Evicted? The building had been condemned. The rowers had noticed—but had not really cared—how their cramped space was, in fact, falling apart.

“I remember being up there, you’re doing ergs, you couldn’t see the walls; there would just be dust,” Cunningham said.

For the rest of his time (and quite a few years thereafter), Temple would row out of tents in the parking lot.

“There’s no porta-potties, so you make do,” Brendan said of the years under the tent. “You don’t know any better. Gav always found a way to make it feel like a great experience.”

But years in the tent, and then their dock falling into the river so they had to walk the boats farther down river to launch them—it all took its toll. Recruiting grew more difficult.

Eventually, new administrators took over at Temple, all out-of-towners, and looked at the books. They decided some sports had to be cut. They looked at everything like they were outside business consultants and they decided rowing would be one of the sports to be axed.

I was writing for The Philadelphia Inquirer at the time and I got in Gavin White’s car right after he was told rowing was done. White was in shock, just short of a rage, but he also told me the sport couldn’t keep going the way it was being neglected.

The outcry, however, was such that the sport was saved; that’s how it works sometimes. No one pays attention until it’s going to be gone. A benefactor, Gerry Lenfest, wrote a big check to restore the boathouse, which is how the years 2018 and 2021 were added to that Dad Vail banner in the lobby.

But what about 2025? Could they get to Henley?

Photo: Lisa Worthy.

Cunningham’s own journey began by watching two older brothers rowing on the Schuylkill for Monsignor Bonner High. Dan had been the first to row, and the first to spot a path to college, St. Joseph’s in his case, where he was eventually a captain. The commitment began in the morning.

“You need at least nine people to show up at 5 o’clock in the morning for practice that’s 30 minutes from the high school,” Dan Cunningham said of rowing for Monsignor Bonner, located in Upper Darby, just outside Philadelphia. “We never had anybody miss in four years.”

Next was Luke. First, Luke thought he was a basketball player, and that’s what he began playing at Bonner. In the summer, some of the best games were at the public courts in Narberth, a suburban borough near the city. Luke didn’t pay much attention to the competition. He just knew how to be a wiseass, even guarding the best guy on the other team. That guy’s dad played in the NBA? Luke trash-talked his man by saying he heard the dad wasn’t that great.

The other kid apparently took that a bit personally. Kobe Bryant didn’t just block Luke’s shot. He caught it and threw the ball over the fence into the adjacent playground.

It was the last straw for Luke. Then and there, he decided that maybe his brother’s sport might be a better fit. Sure enough, he proceeded from Bonner to become an all-Ivy rower at Brown. (His wiseass ways have served him well, too, as a standup comedian; a staff writer at The Tonight Show, writing jokes for Jimmy Fallon; and lead writer for the VMA Awards and the ESPYs.)

As important as Brendan’s brothers were his coaches. One of the Bonner coaches, Mike Cipollone, was the father of 2004 gold medal-winning Olympic coxswain Pete Cipollone. In addition to head coach Krmpotich, there was the coach’s brother, Jim, who was always there helping out. The brothers grew up rowing in Duluth, Minn.

“I think he lived over in East Falls,” Brendan said of Jim Krmpotich’s taking charge of winter workouts, including on snowy days. “We were always like, Is school canceled? But practice would never be canceled, because Jim Krump would be able to drive his little Honda Civic to Bonner, and that meant you had to figure it out. If your parents couldn’t drive, you had to walk through the snow. You had to get there. That was the template you had to work off.”

Running the hills over at Cobbs Creek golf course was part of the winter workout, just a little warmup. The course was a couple of miles from the school.

“You’d run over, run the hills, like 10 up-and-downs, then you’d run back, and that was before school,” Cunningham said.

Dave Krmpotich would be out there with them.

“I never saw him wear gloves, ever in my life,” Brendan Cunningham said. “If it was really cold, he’d put socks on his hands. He was just tough as nails. He’d do the warmup runs with us, and beat us. He would do workouts on the erg, and beat us. It was a thing to try to beat Krump. You would hear stories. I think he ran the loop (around the Schuylkill River) one time, got hit by a car, finished the workout, and then went to the hospital.”

“Dave Krump, he never chased you to be at practice,” Luke Cunningham said. “He never pursued you to be on the team. If you’re here, I’m going to work you. How much work can you deal with before failure?”

Since Dan was the first Cunningham to row, Luke went down to the river to watch. He remembers their dad talking about how the rowing races used to be a big gambling enterprise. “Before the NFL, there used to be 100,000 people at the river.”

Luke thought the whole sport seemed kind of glamorous. He envied his brother.

“I very quickly figured out he was out of the house at 4:40 in the morning,” Luke said.

Brendan thinks about it still, ninth-graders being sent out to a busy river in the pre-dawn—crazy! But he turned out to be the lifer. By the time he was done rowing at Temple, Cunningham decided he’d try to emulate Krmpotich and Gavin White’s booming voice from the launch and get into coaching himself. His first stop was at Washington College in Maryland for two years as a graduate assistant.

“I worked for the guy who wrote The Nuts and Bolts Guide to Rigging,” Cunningham said. “Mike Davenport. I knew how to rig and de-rig a boat. I knew to make sure the nuts and bolts were tight. But I didn’t know much about how the pin could move in, the pin could move out, how to change the gearing, how to change the loading. It was just interesting to know if you have two people of different sizes, you can rig differently to get maximum boat speed.”

Next stop was another volunteer gig—at Yale.

“I want to see what it’s like at the top level,” Cunningham said, recalling his pitch.

“Great,” he was told. “We can’t pay you.”

Steve Gladstone, Yale’s head coach at the time, is on every short list of the top American coaches in the history of the sport, in addition to being so respected that he was named athletic director at Cal while coaching in Berkeley.

At Yale, Brendan wasn’t treated as a mere volunteer; he was considered part of the team, and Gladstone understood he was there to learn everything. One gathering, Brendan was told to go sit with the board of directors of the rowing program, to take in their conversation, since he’d be dealing with the money someday if he stayed in the sport.

Gladstone was way ahead of the curve in figuring out that there were ways to measure a recruit objectively, once all ergs produced uniform times. He’d demand a recruit produce a time in competition so it could be believed, but that competition could be anywhere in the world.

After his apprenticeship at Yale, Cunningham was hired as a full-time assistant at Penn, then moved to Drexel, where Paul Savell’s program had become dominant at Dad Vail. A big takeaway from Savell: Talk to these kids, all the time. They’re college students; they want to hear from you.

“You could not have produced a better pedigree of coaches to produce Brendan,” said Luke Cunningham, who’d been an assistant coach himself at Columbia and UCLA while pursuing his full-time career in comedy.

Just inside the Temple rowing office is a cheap version of a WWF wrestling belt. Whichever Temple rower has a big day on the erg, he gets to wear the belt. Luke’s idea. Just to keep things fun while they’re doing the work.

Do they wear the belt proudly?

“Uh, they put it on,” Brendan said.

“He has ways to motivate each rower individually,” Yates, now graduated from Temple, said of Cunningham. “He tries to figure out how each person is motivated, and uses that to motivate them.”

Photo: Tim McCall / Temple Athletics.

The first varsity eight had more incentive. They’d caught wind of a documentary being made about Philadelphia collegiate rowing. They’d heard the filmmakers were hanging around Drexel and La Salle, which had finished 1-2 the year before, with Temple third, less than a tenth of a second behind La Salle.

“We were upset about the film,” Ryan Yates said of the documentary, It’s a Philly Thing.

What’s more of a Philly thing than a grudge fueling your own work? They compared themselves to the Eagles a lot, said coxswain Grace Crosby, combining an underdog mentality (“especially compared to the elite kids on Boathouse Row”) with a belief they were ready to win the big races.

The spring season proved their readiness, with Temple finishing on top of La Salle and Drexel just before the Dad Vails, which were over in South Jersey on the Cooper River again.

“We knew we had to come out swinging and keep going,” said Kevin Harvell, in the five-seat in last year’s varsity eight. “We had a powerful jump.”

Get the bow in front, stay in front, right to plan. They were in front for the first half of the race, but La Salle wasn’t rattled. They were coming fast.

“We were neck and neck for a long time,” Yates said. “To the very end.”

After the race, Yates said, it was a heart-racing two minutes.

They could see folks in Temple colors celebrating on the banks of the Cooper, but that’s not confirmation. Crosby, the coxswain, wanted to tell them they’d won, but she had stayed focused on her own boat until after the line. She didn’t want to say anything to her rowers until she knew for sure.

She called over to Cunningham. He confirmed it was official. Temple finished in 5:37.711, with La Salle clocked at 5:38.073.

At the dock, celebration in full swing, Temple’s coach saw Yates and brought up their exchange of a year earlier. They hadn’t spoken about it since the texts.

“You know what this means?” Cunningham said.

“Henley,” Yates said.

The coach nodded. For this program that had survived a boathouse eviction and the threat of being terminated permanently, and this coach who had jump-started his own path with a million meters on the erg, the 2025 season was not over.

It would end on the River Thames.

 

Mike Jensen wrote for The Philadelphia Inquirer for 35 years and was named Pennsylvania Sportswriter of the Year in 2023. He covered rowing on the Schuylkill River and at the Beijing Olympics and wrote the weekly Merion Mercy Academy crew newsletter for seven years while two of his daughters were champion rowers at the school. His book, Philly Hoops: How Philadelphia Transformed Basketball, will be published in late 2026.

Austin Rowing Club Hosts 43rd Heart of Texas Regatta

Since 1983, Austin Rowing Club has hosted the regatta on Lady Bird Lake in Austin, Texas.

 

Austin Rowing Club, the oldest rowing club in Texas, hosts the 43rd edition of The Heart of Texas Regatta, Feb. 28 to March 1 on Lady Bird Lake. The 1,000-meter sprint race has attracted 675 junior, club, and masters entries, up from 639 entries last year and nearly double in the past 25 years.

“We love hosting teams from across the country,” says regatta director Megan Getman. “One of the things we love about hosting it is that we get to help novices have their first experience with sprint races and help seasoned racers knock off the winter cobwebs.”

The regatta features a seven-lane, fully buoyed course on the lake formed by the Longhorn Dam on the Colorado River, originally as a power plant’s cooling pond.

Dallas United had the fastest women’s junior eight last year but does not return this year. Texas Rowing Center, had the fastest men’s junior eight in 2025 and is entered again this year.

Training for that Pinnacle Regatta

RowAmerica Rye won the 2025 youth nationals women’s youth eight at Nathan Benderson Park in Sarasota Florida. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

At this time of year, coaches and athletes are putting the finishing touches on their plans for the upcoming on-water season. Already, the first and most important decision should have been made: What’s the goal this season? Which regatta is the pinnacle, where crews will give their all?

For high schools, universities, and clubs, this is probably the regional or national championship. For masters, it may be a regatta close to home or at an exciting destination.

Whatever the case, this ultimate race becomes the benchmark toward which the team must work. Whether the goal is to win the regatta, reach the final, or achieve a respectable place, it’s possible to calculate accurately the kind of  performance required, on and off the water, to achieve it.

To be a successful coach, you need to know the level of performance necessary to succeed on the racecourse where your crew will compete. This means knowing the speed at which teams in the past have rowed to achieve your target finish, which then determines training speeds. You should take into account the particular characteristics and conditions of the regatta course and compare them with your home waters.

Next, evaluate the rowing skills and physiological performance of previous teams in the target regatta. Watch race videos to assess the technical proficiency of the crews and get the ergometer scores of teams that have participated in the past.

Evaluate your team’s performance objectively and provide accurate feedback so your rowers are realistic about what’s possible. It’s folly to dream of gold medals if training results show the team isn’t ready.

Explain your findings in an understandable way and chart the next steps. Do your rowers need to focus on technique or should they boost their stamina by adding another training session?

If your team is progressing better than expected, consider elevating the goal. Instead of just reaching the final, maybe they should aim for the podium—if they improve their start or begin their final sprint 100 meters earlier.

Volker Nolte, an internationally recognized expert on the biomechanics of rowing, is the author of Rowing Science, Rowing Faster, and Masters Rowing. He’s a retired professor of biomechanics at the University of Western Ontario, where he coached the men’s rowing team to three Canadian national titles.

Taking Recruiting to the Next Level

Being direct in your communication is almost always a smart approach. You may not always receive the answer you were hoping for but you will gain clarity. Photo: Lisa Worthy.

 

The recruiting process can be tricky to navigate for many students and families. There are a small number of recruits who are so accomplished in rowing, with standout erg scores and racing credentials, that most of the programs they contact will be eager to make an offer—assuming they can gain admission to the university. For the majority of student-athletes, however, the process is far more nuanced.

Consider a typical high-school junior beginning the search for the best university fit. It’s common for an athlete to communicate initially with 15 to 20 different coaching staffs. Some of those conversations go very well; others may not gain much traction. Over time, that broad list is narrowed usually to five schools about which the athlete is genuinely excited—and, just as important, where there may be mutual interest.

At that point, a critical question arises: How do you know whether you can take the recruiting process to the next level?

Here’s a real-life example from my work. We’ll call the athlete Mary. Mary receives an official visit invitation from one school. She visits campus, enjoys the experience, and the coaches express strong interest in having her as part of their 2027 recruiting class. They provide an aggressive timeline and begin discussing a potential commitment with Mary and her parents.

The challenge: While Mary likes the school, it’s her third or fourth choice. She’s in frequent communication with her fifth-choice program and has had meaningful conversations with her top two schools, but those relationships do not seem as far along. How does Mary move the process forward with the programs she prefers?

Here’s an important insider tip: Coaches don’t always know where they stand on your list. They’re communicating with many more recruits than they’ll bring into their program. As a result, clear and direct communication from the athlete can be extremely helpful—and often very effective.

In Mary’s situation, a strong next step would be to schedule a phone call or, ideally, a video call with the coaches at her top two schools. During that conversation, she can be transparent, letting them know they are currently her top choices and that she has received a strong offer from another program lower on her list.

Then she can ask two important questions:

1. Can I schedule an official visit?

2. What do you coaches need to see from me to consider me seriously for the next recruiting class?

Being direct in your communication is almost always a smart approach. You may not always receive the answer you were hoping for but you will gain clarity. That clarity allows you to make informed decisions and move forward with programs that are as excited about you as you are about them.

Robbie Tenenbaum coached at the NCAA level for over 30 years and with the U.S. Junior National Team for eight. He now helps rowers and families navigate the university recruiting process.

Clearing Up Confusion About Sugar

Limiting sugar intake does not harm anyone. Sugar is not an essential nutrient.

 

I’ve cut out sugar. Gurus on social media say it’s fattening, a waste of calories, and toxic.

I have a sweet tooth. Given the choice of eating more dinner or having dessert, I’ll always choose dessert!

Is Coke healthier if made with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup?

If you’re like most of my clients, you’re confused about the role of sugar in your daily sports diet. The anti-sugar “experts” (who speak to the general public, not specifically to athletes) argue that sugar is health-erosive. Sports nutrition researchers claim sugar enhances performance. So for athletes, is sugar friend or foe?

Sugar: Avoid it!

• Limiting sugar intake does not harm anyone. Sugar is not an essential nutrient. Our bodies can make sugar (glucose) by breaking down muscle and fat tissue or by converting the fat and protein we eat into glucose.

• The average American consumes about 17 teaspoons of added sugar a day (60 pounds a year). That’s a lot of empty calories. Populations with a high intake of added sugars tend to have health issues. By reducing added sugar to less than 10 percent of total calories, they can reduce tooth decay and the risk of weight gain, obesity, and associated health issues.

• Dietary sugar can drive up blood sugar. The risk of diabetes increases by 38 percent in those who routinely consume the sugar equivalent of a can of soda a day.

• Drinking Coca-Cola made with cane sugar is no better for you than Coca-Cola made with high-fructose corn syrup.

Cane sugar (also called sucrose) is comprised of 50 percent glucose, 50 percent fructose. High-fructose corn syrup is 45 percent glucose, 55 percent fructose. Both are metabolized similarly. Although President Trump says all-natural cane sugar “is just better,” science does not support that belief. Both contribute to health problems. Drinking Coke made with cane sugar will not make America healthier.

• With very high sugar consumption (sports drinks, gels, soda, candy), one could become nutrient-depleted. Empty- calorie sugar offers no nutritional value yet displaces nourishing food, which can lead to a lackluster sports diet.

Sugar and rowers: Moderation!

• Sugar consumption increased from less than 10 pounds per person a year in the late 1800s to about 100 pounds per person a year by 1945. It remained relatively flat until 1980. Yet our health improved between 1880 and 1980. We can’t blame just sugar for health problems. Lack of exercise, high stress, and poverty are also health-erosive.

• Sugar (a “carb”) is in breast milk, dairy food, fruit, vegetables, honey, potatoes, corn, quinoa, and all grains. People around the globe have consumed these foods for years. So why now are sugar and “carbs” deemed responsible for creating human obesity and diseases?

• Such fear-mongering terms as unhealthy, poisonous, and toxic are simply unscientific. People who lack knowledge of physiology fail to understand that sugar is not inherently fattening, nor is one particular food inherently healthy or unhealthy. An apple is a healthy food; a diet of all apples is very unhealthy.

• Our present state of poor health is not because we consume sugar and our diets are unhealthy. Rather, we are physically inactive. Too little exercise reduces our ability to metabolize sugar optimally. That, along with environmental factors, endocrine disrupters, stress, etc., explain the fundamental causes of obesity and metabolic disease.

• In terms of diabetes prevention, you should be concerned about blood sugar, not dietary sugar. A rise in blood sugar that occurs after eating is not pathological—unless unfit muscles and the liver fail to take up the sugar. It’s not what you eat, but what your body does with what you eat.

With inactivity, the body becomes less able to transport sugar out of blood and into muscle. This erodes metabolic health. Also with inactivity, a person can easily overeat because energy intake gets dissociated from energy expenditure.

Remember: The bodies of athletes are metabolically very different from the bodies of the sedentary. You want to stay active to preserve your ability to enjoy some sweets without hurting your health.

• Sugar cravings happen when the body needs fuel. If you eat before you run out of fuel, you will tame your sweet tooth. Have a second lunch when you are droopy and low on energy in the afternoon instead of devouring sweets in the evening. That said, a desire for sweets can also be a genetic preference.

Concluding comments

Lack of physical activity is a bigger threat to health than sugar. For people who are overfat and underfit, a diet low in sugar and starch is likely a wise idea. But for athletic people like rowers (who are at lower risk for heart disease, diabetes, and obesity), sugar and carbs are not toxic; they are an important fuel for enhancing athletic performance.

The one-size diet does not fit all. No one is suggesting that athletes should eat more sugar. Instead, rowers can embrace a sports diet that includes an appropriate balance of sugars and starches (carbohydrates) in each meal.  Strive for a healthy eating pattern that offers 85 percent to 90 percent quality foods and 10 percent to 15 percent fun foods, such as apple pie instead of an apple.

If you are fearful sugar will harm your health, keep in mind that fear-mongering relies on cherry-picked research that can prove what the “expert” wants to prove. Fear-mongering “experts” have created distrust of the food industry and have shaped opinions that support raw foods, super foods, whole foods, organic foods, and clean eating.  Confusion reigns!

My suggestions:

—Enjoy a variety of foods to get a variety of nutrients.

—Limit added sugar to less than 10 percent of your total calories (about 250 sugar calories per day for an active woman; 300 sugar calories for an active man).

—If you currently limit your sugar intake to a weekly “cheat day,” try this experiment: Enjoy a small sweet daily as a part of lunch or afternoon snack. This can curb your urge to binge on sweets in an unhealthy way on a cheat day. Sugar binges are what give sugar a bad name.

Nancy Clark, M.S., R.D., C.S.S.D., counsels both fitness exercisers and competitive athletes in the Boston area (Newton; 617-795-1875). Her best-selling Sports Nutrition Guidebook is a popular resource, as is her online workshop. For more information, visit NancyClarkRD.com

The Art of Making Mistakes

It’s inevitable: throughout your career, you’ll make mistakes, big and small. PHOTO: Lisa Worthy.

 

It’s inevitable: Maybe you hit a buoy, have a brush with a bridge, or you call the sprint far too early. Throughout your coxing career, you’ll make mistakes, big and small.

I spoke to Matilda Horn, assistant coach with the Cambridge University women, former Great Britain senior-team and Olympic coxswain and worlds silver medalist, and co-founder of The Winning Cox, about making—and recovering from—mistakes. 

In our conversation, I confessed to Matilda that I forgot my CoxBox for my first away race. Her reply?

“I forgot my CoxBox going to the final of the world championships.”

From your first day shoving off the dock to an Olympic final, coxswains of all levels will make mistakes. What differentiates the best coxswains is how you respond and recover.

So, something bad has happened. What next?

First, if it’s been a collision or a safety issue, get yourself and your crew into a good spot.

“Go into pilot mode and get yourself out of the situation really, really well,” Horn said. “You can give yourself permission to have a minute. If it’s in a race scenario, you might need to just get through it. Then you can give yourself a minute and go: ‘Right, so I’ve messed up, and that’s OK. What have I learned from it?’”

It’s easier said than done, but it’s important to be accountable. There’s nothing wrong with a quick apology and admitting that you have made an error.

“I think the biggest thing is owning your mistakes,” Horn said. “Because you’re scared or you’re worried about what people might think, the temptation is to hide. As a cox you’re supposed to have this bravado, so the temptation is to say this wasn’t my fault, or this wasn’t me, or whatever reason you can come up with to save face.”

Owning up to the mistake honestly and without groveling helps you earn credibility with your rowers and your coach. As a coxswain, you want to show that you can handle responsibility without getting defensive or making excuses.

That being said, your rowers need ownership but they still need a strong leader. Don’t let the mistake shake you to the core. Too many times, I’ve seen a coxswain make a serious error in practice and then spend the rest of the practice in stunned silence. Make sure that you rebound.

“You’re not owning the mistake to the point that it crushes you or changes who you are,” Horn said. “You don’t want it to be the thing that people can turn around and use against you. So you have to react in a way that goes: I know I made a mistake, and this is how I’m going to respond. So that’s the bit where you earn respect and people say, fair enough, and give you the time to recover from that mistake.”

Once you’re off the water and away from a team environment, you can give yourself a little more time. If you need to get more emotional or do some processing, out of the boat and after the session is a good time. Call someone unrelated to the situation, explain, and have a good cry if you need to.

“Be really mad about it, be really sad about it, and then go to your safe space and let all the emotions out,” Horn said. (And if you’ve really damaged something, she added, “that’s what insurance is for.”)

After you’ve done a bit of emotional recovery, you’re going to need to get back on the water and do it again.

“It’s OK to be sad or scared about something,” Horn said. “But it’s like if you fall off your bike, the best way to get over it is to get back on it. It sounds cliché, but then you can go: OK, how am I going to be able to do this again? What do I need to feel safe again?”

If you need a bit of extra support from your coach or teammates—more help with steering, another practice at backing into the stakeboat, more communication from a stroke or bow seat about what’s happening around them—don’t hesitate to ask for help. The point, Horn said, is that you (or you and your coach) can come up with a solution that helps you feel safer on the water. Then you can begin building up your confidence.

Mistakes happen to us all as long as we are in boats.

“Say you’re sorry, but also make sure [your rowers] know that you’re in control of what you take away from that mistake; they don’t get to determine that for you. They don’t get to own your mistake, but you do,” Horn said.

Be responsible, articulate what you’ve learned, and make a plan to avoid that error in the future. And when something happens, don’t let it shake you to your core. Hop back in the stern and show your rowers just how responsible and resilient you can be. 

Hannah Woodruff is an assistant coach and recruiting coordinator for the Radcliffe heavyweight team. She began rowing at Phillips Exeter Academy, was a coxswain at Wellesley College, and has coached college, high-school, and club crews for over 10 years.

Coaches are educators and leaders, not customer-service representatives.

Coaches are educators and leaders, not customer-service representatives. When that line blurs, authority erodes, hours expand, and burnout accelerates. PHOTO: Intersport-images.com.

 

By CJ Bown

The recent SafeSport survey that revealed the reasons for coach attrition didn’t tell me anything new. It simply put data behind conversations many coaches have been having with me for years.

Rowing coaches aren’t burning out and leaving the sport because they don’t care. Coaches are burning out and leaving because the job has expanded far beyond coaching. For many coaches, the job now involves managing parents, and most do so without training, structure, or support.

In rowing, pressure rarely shows up on the sideline. In fact, there really isn’t a sideline where it can manifest. Rowing doesn’t look like most youth sports. There aren’t parents yelling at officials or shouting instructions from the stands. There’s no obvious flashpoint.

The pressure on coaches builds elsewhere. In emails. In texts.

In conversations that begin politely and slowly turn into second-guessing of training plans, development timelines, and race-day lineups.

Why did they do that at practice? Why are they seat racing again? Why isn’t my athlete in the top boat?

None of these questions is unreasonable on its own. But with 50 plus athletes on the team, these conversations compound, creating an environment where coaches feel constantly evaluated and quietly undermined. That’s exactly the kind of tension and distrust the SafeSport survey describes.

Rowing is a long-term lifelong sport competing with a short-term “give me results now” culture.

Many families come to rowing with expectations shaped by other sports, where advancement feels faster and outcomes are better understood.  Rowing isn’t on SportsCenter and it’s not “mainstream,” so when rowing doesn’t deliver immediate validation, frustration builds. The coach becomes the most obvious place for that frustration to land.

The SafeSport data make clear that this dynamic is a major driver of coach burnout. In rowing, it’s compounded by the reality that many junior programs rely heavily on dues and fundraising. That creates an imbalance where coaches can feel exposed when pressure escalates and expectations collide with the cost and leverage of paid dues.

Rowing already runs on a thin coaching pipeline. There are few full-time roles, limited paths for advancement, and let’s be honest, not much money. Despite growing youth participation and demand, the sport relies on a small number of highly committed coaches carrying an oversized load for modest to no pay.

The incentives to coach in rowing aren’t strong. Hours are long and unpredictable. Early mornings, late nights, and weekends on the road. Compensation is limited and plateaus quickly.

Add constant parental pressure on top of that, and the question becomes obvious: Why would a good coach choose to do this long term?

When a coach leaves, the impact is immediate. I know; I get this call once a week. Rowing knowledge walks out the door. Teams scramble to find a novice coach so development doesn’t stall. Continuity with the varsity team breaks.

In most cases, programs don’t fail loudly, they shrink quietly, scale back, or fade out over a few seasons.

It’s a structural, foundational problem baked into how the sport operates. And it’s why the SafeSport findings aren’t surprising. Now, those of us in rowing have to work together to build and support the response.

Parent management isn’t just an important skill. It’s a core part of the job.

I’ve worked in the sport a long time and spent countless hours around both the coaches and the parent boards that support junior rowing teams. To me, the most important takeaway from the SafeSport survey is the need for better education, training, and support specific to managing parents.

My recommendations:

Coaches must be prepared for the full scope of the role.

This is on the coaches as much as it is on the parent boards. Coaching education does a solid job covering technique, training, and safety. But it doesn’t do a great job of teaching communication, expectation setting, and conflict navigation—areas that consume the most time and emotional energy.

Expectations must be set early and consistently.

Most conflicts don’t appear mid-season. They grow out of assumptions that were never addressed up front. Clear, consistent parent education can reduce a significant amount of friction before it reaches the coach, which matters when coaches are already working long hours for modest pay.

Support must be structural, not just verbal.

Saying “we support our coaches” doesn’t mean anything if, when pressure rises, coaches are left to handle it alone. While I understand that parent volunteers on the board are busy, too, when coaches are questioned, real support and real backing matter even more.

Coaches are educators and leaders, not customer-service representatives. When that line blurs, authority erodes, hours expand, and burnout accelerates. In a sport where coaches aren’t paid well to begin with, that tradeoff stops making sense very quickly.

Schools and boards must create a coach-support policy that relieves coaches of parent-conflict management. It needs to protect coaching authority through clearly defined escalation and communication protocols.

Honesty about development matters, too.

It’s hard for parents to hear that a son or daughter might not be the star athlete they want them to be. Not every athlete rows varsity. Not every athlete is recruited. When those realities aren’t stated bluntly, parental frustration and disappointment can build.

Those feelings then land on coaches, who are already doing the best they can to support the team. Programs should state realistic development and recruiting expectations for families before the season begins so coaches don’t have to manage cases of disappointment individually.

Combine the above recommendations and we can position coaches for real success—but only if we act and make actual changes.

The SafeSport survey doesn’t solve a mystery; it confirms something coaches already know. Unmanaged parent pressure is a major reason they leave. The fix isn’t complicated but it requires intent and follow-through. Do these things and you reduce the pressure that drives good coaches out of rowing.

The rowing community doesn’t need to panic but we do need to recognize that protecting coaches is as important as protecting athletes. It’s a responsibility we can’t keep ignoring.

C.J. Bown began his coaching career at Marquette University. He is vice president of sales at Pocock Racing Shells and president of sales and marketing at Finish Line Shell Repair.

On the Thames, Anything Can Happen

The Cambridge men remain strong favorites, and the Dark Blue women still have the favorites tag. But the Cambridge women are closing the gap. PHOTO Courtesy The Boat Race.

 

By Martin Cross

On the last day of January, the putative Oxford men’s Blue boat was barreling down the Thames championship course at full pelt. They were matched against an eight from London Rowing Club. The waters off The Boat Race start at Putney had been full of all sorts of boats, forced off the non-tidal stretches of the Thames because of the impossibly fast stream conditions (the UK and rain…).

Right on the corner of the Fulham bend, the London crew—at that point nearly a length down on Oxford—had to hold their boat up hard as they threatened to ram a flotilla of sailing boats. Collision was averted, the race restarted, and both London and Oxford went on to share the honors in a well-matched encounter.

Anything can happen in The Boat Race, and this was a reminder of that.

Yes, The Boat Race fixture season is upon us—that time of year when the Oxbridge squads take on the finest domestic and international opposition on the famous championship course.

The next day, the Tideway was again packed, as Oxford’s women dominated their fixture against London Rowing Club. But the most interesting contest on the first of February was the four races between eight–yes, eight–Oxford Brookes eights. The university club that has frankly dominated student rowing in the UK was back!

Last year was an unhappy one for the Brookes Boat Club. Controversies and bad publicity over the methodology of its coaches had forced the club to withdraw from the 2025 fixture season, when the Brookes rowers were supposed to pit themselves against the Blue boats. The run of bad luck continued at Henley, where the club failed to win a trophy for the first time in a long while.

But 2026 has seen a rejuvenated Brookes return to the tidal Thames with new men’s and women’s chief coaches ready to take on the Blue boats.

Ali Brown, a fresh-faced, incredibly enthusiastic coach, stepped out of the prestigious Leander Club setup to take on what he called “a dream job.” Despite last year’s controversy, Brown has no shortage of athletes. He has entered nine Brookes crews for the Head of the River Race on the 28th of March.

But before then, Brown is salivating over the prospect of racing both Oxford and Cambridge Blue boats, the former on the seventh of March and the latter just a couple of weeks earlier on the 21st of February.

Traditionally, the Brookes stable of athletes includes rowers who have graduated but still compete for their alma mater. Brown has made the brave decision, however, to race against the Blue boats with just undergraduates. The Brookes match racing on the first of February was, in Brown’s words, “to give the new lads a first look at the championship course.”

The Brookes fixtures will be anticipated eagerly, as will the matchup between the men and women of Cambridge and the Dutch national squad. Of course, the two eights from The Netherlands blew away competition from the rest of the world to take two golds at the Shanghai World Rowing Championships last year. Earlier in the season, The Netherlands men’s eight were run close by an exceptional Light Blue crew in the Grand at Henley.

But the two eights that will wear orange for the fixtures on the eighth of March will be athletes from the Dutch development squad. The seniors will have spent several weeks up at altitude and will have come down only on the fifth of March. That’s deemed too soon for them to race Cambridge on the Thames.

Meanwhile, the rumor mill has been working overtime on the likely relative speeds of both men’s and women’s Boat Race crews. Cambridge’s reserve boat was said to have beaten the men of Thames Rowing Club on the Tideway. Given that Thames and London are a similar speed, and factoring in the result of London vs. Oxford, that means that Cambridge’s first boat (at this stage) is faster than Oxford’s best crew.

The Cambridge women shared the honors against a very strong Thames R.C. eight, though apparently they were bettered by a Leander crew that came up to the Light Blues Ely course, in the east of the UK, as the speed of the river at Leander’s Henley base is too fast.

What does all this mean? Well, the Cambridge men remain strong favorites, and the Dark Blue women still have the favorites tag. But the Cambridge women are closing the gap.

Moreover, the Light Blues have a significant performance advantage in that they can continue to row on their Ely stretch of water, which is unaffected by the stream and floods. Oxford, however, can’t row out of their Thames-based boathouse until the rain stops and the waters on the Wallingford stretch subside. So the Dark Blues have to find water elsewhere. That means significant traveling time and, frankly, a bit of a logistic nightmare.